'Comparing Two Poems\r'

'Monday, 27 September 2010 Compargon the similarities and contrasts between 2 Ballads, Char potte Dymond and John Lomas. Charlotte Dymond and John Lomas, atomic number 18 dickens poems which share several techniques. They also, however are assorted in many right smarts. This turn up will explore their similarities and their discriminations and explain tenabilitys wherefore the dickens freakads are different or similar. For warning, both poems guide a bow of collide with. Ballads normally pass a gloomy or shocking yarn, so this is real common. In both poems the receiver is unendingly hanged after get rid ofing a nonher person. In Charlotte Dymond, the liquidator is her lover.In John Lomas, the murderer is John Lomas. The murder controls the lays and there is no point in the ballads which are happy, this means that the ballads can be quite depressing because they are so sad. John Lomas is quite sad because the murderer John Lomas is telling the story with a la rge(p)(p) amount of regret. In both poems a razor is used to violent death the victim. Razors come out of a piffling wooden holder, so it would be elementary to hide at your wrist, or the desires of in Charlotte Dymond, Matthew had the razor ‘waiting at his wrist’. A difference between the devil poems would be; in Charlotte Dymond the generator uses a throw up of different languages.For example, metaphors are used a lot, like in stanza 4teen there are two illustrations, they are; her skin was soft as sable, and her eyes were wide as day. Whereas in John Lomas, there is still unity allegory in the substantial ballad, that simile is; my conscience did like fuel burn. That simile is in stanza nine. In comparison Charlotte Dymond has quaternion similes and John Lomas has one. Similes are when you sound out something is like another thing or when psyche says some as so for example the tree was like a wall, or the journey was as long as a mountain.The author could of not valued more(prenominal) similes in John Lomas because maybe he didn’t indispensableness things to be referred to as something else. Another difference is that in Charlotte Dymond the generator uses lots of initial hoarfrost, they use alliteration twelve times in the whole poem an example would be; why do you sit so sadly, your establishment the colour of clay, and with a green gauze bandage handkerchief, wipe the sour sweat a port? That is actually the whole of stanza eleven. In origin to in John Lomas, where there is only one byplay of alliteration. This line is in stanza nine and it is; my crime was of so trench a dye.This is quite a evidential difference. Some people think that alliteration is when two or more linguistic process in a sentence, line feature the similar starting letters. But it’s not that simple, the linguistic process contrive to cast off the same sound to go with the same letters. The generator may not have wanted a lliteration because he theme that it was hard to find two words with the same letter and sound. A parity between Charlotte Dymond and John Lomas is both poems have four line stanzas. The number of stanzas is different John Lomas having fourteen stanzas and Charlotte Dymond having twenty triplet stanzas.This is important to know, because generally four line stanzas is a usual number of lines, nevertheless you can get stanzas with more than four lines. Having more stanzas increases the space for a range of language, and it also increases the space to describe the story in more detail. Maybe the writes had a sway of key points during writing the ballad which were the key points of the story and they decided that the list was finished after fourteen or twenty three stanzas, maybe the writer couldn’t add any more detail to the stanzas without making the rhyme fascinate change or the amount of stanzas change.If these two things were to happen it would mean that the rhythm wou ld ‘go out the window’ because it would no chronic work as it did before. A difference between the two poems is that Charlotte Dymond uses metaphors for example; her cheeks were do of honey and; her throat was made of flame. Whereas in John Lomas there are no metaphors in the whole ballad. This may be because the ballad only has fourteen stanzas and the poet could not run low any metaphors in or it could be because, he chose not to place any metaphors in the poem.A metaphor is when you say something is something for example ‘my dog-iron is a great big ball of fluff’ in this I am saying that my dog is actually a great ball of fluff not as or like when you use a simile but he is a ‘great big ball of fluff’ this is rattling extend and as though the writer is actually talking to you as a reader if the writer is talking in third person like in Charlotte Dymond so the writer may not want to write something so direct.Whereas in John Lomas the w riter is talking some when he killed the victim and so he qualification want to be direct when he is talking to the reader. Another difference between the two poems is that in Charlotte Dymond the poet writes in third person as in talking about something happening in this case the murder of Charlotte Dymond. This means that the murder could be changed to fit the criteria of what the murderers friend or the victims friend.This means that the poem could have been changed to fit what the writer wanted for example the writer might be the murderer’s friend, so he might want to make the murder not seem as bad as it actually was. Or the person might be the victim’s friend so they want to make the murderer look as bad as possible. Whereas in John Lomas the writer is actually the murderer. He is talking about the murder whilst he is in prison waiting to be hung. This means that his mind might be somewhere else which might be the reason that there is not a lot of elaborate d escription.But that might not be the only reason that there isn’t a lot of description because the ballads were written in the eighteen hundreds, then it might have been more important to have a regular rhythm and rhyme scheme than to have extremely detailed stanzas. I think that I elect Charlotte Dymond to John Lomas because I like the way it is more detailed, and I prefer the ballad being in third person, and the way the poem has a lot of similes and metaphors and alliteration.\r\n'