The Orthodox Tradition in Eastern Europe Essay -- Religion Russia 19th

The Jewish- Jewish-Orthodox usance in Eastern Europe afterwards the 4th blow when Constantinople emerged as a great capital and church building service center, tensions sometimes arose amidst its leaders and the bishop of capital of Italy. After the fall of Rome to Germanic invaders in 476, the popish pope was the besides guardian of Christian universalism in the West. He began more explicitly to arrogate his dominance to Romes being the burial place of nonsuch rooster, whom Jesus had called the rock on which the church was to be built. The Eastern Christians consider that tradition and recognized the roman letters patriarch to a measure of artless authority. But they never believed that this authority allowed the papacy to knock everyplace another church or that it made the pope into a universally reliable issue within the larger church. The Orthodox tradition assert that the character and rights of the church were fully present in each local community of Orthodox believers with its own bishop. All bishops were equal, and patriarchs or synods of bishops exercised only an vigilance of cargon among the soundbox of coequal bishops. The precedence of honor of individual case churches dep cease on historical rank. Therefore, the patriarchate of Constantinople understood its own position to be determined altogether by the fact that Constantinople, the new Rome, was the seat of the Roman emperor butterfly and the Senate in a world where church boundaries, for administrative reasons, reflected semipolitical limits.Apart from the diametric understandings of the personality of church power, the most significant self-opinionated difference among Eastern and Western Christians arose over the exact phrasing of the Nicene Creed. The Orthodox churches demanded that no words be added to or taken away from the old-fashioned and fundamental statement of the faith, as issued by the councils of Nicaea and Constantinople in the 4th century. During the archaeozoic Middle Ages the Latin word filioque, meaning and from the Son, was added in the Latin Christian world, thus rendering the creed as I believe in the Holy Spirit who proceeds from the Father and from the Son. Charlemagne and his successors promoted the outburst, earlier opposed by the popes, in Europe. Eventually, it was in like manner accepted in Rome in more or less 1014. Western theologians believed that this teaching preserved the spirit of the lord creed. But Orthodox teachers believed that it had n... ...r tsars, capital of the Russian Federation had become the so-called third Rome, involve heir to the lofty and ecclesiastical supremacy of ancient Rome and Constantinople. The patriarchs of Moscow never enjoyed anything wish the relative freedom of the Byzantine patriarchs, where church laws adjust the interference of the emperor and were generally respected. In Russia the tsars exercised complete domination over church affairs, keep out for the brie f reign of Patriarch Nikon in the mid-17th century. In 1721 Tsar Peter the Great abolished the patriarchate altogether, and thereafter the church was governed through with(predicate) the imperial administration. The patriarchate was reestablished in 1917, at the time of the Russian Revolution, but soon afterward the Russian church was violently persecuted by the commie government. As the Soviet regime became less repressive and, in 1991, stone-broke up, the church started to detect its vitality. The Orthodox churches in Eastern Europe also faced persecution by oppressive Communist governments after World state of war II ended in 1945, but they too regained their authority in the 1990s and are slowly reestablishing their place in the moral, religious, and cultural deportment of their people. The Orthodox Tradition in Eastern Europe Essay -- Religion Russia 19thThe Orthodox Tradition in Eastern EuropeAfter the 4th century when Constantinople emerged as a great cap ital and church center, tensions sometimes arose between its leaders and the bishop of Rome. After the fall of Rome to Germanic invaders in 476, the Roman pope was the only guardian of Christian universalism in the West. He began more explicitly to attribute his dominance to Romes being the burial place of Saint Peter, whom Jesus had called the rock on which the church was to be built. The Eastern Christians respected that tradition and recognized the Roman patriarch to a measure of honorable authority. But they never believed that this authority allowed the papacy to overrule another church or that it made the pope into a universally reliable figure within the larger church. The Orthodox tradition asserted that the character and rights of the church were fully present in each local community of Orthodox believers with its own bishop. All bishops were equal, and patriarchs or synods of bishops exercised only an oversight of care among the body of coequal bishops. The precedence of h onor of individual national churches depended on historical rank. Therefore, the patriarchate of Constantinople understood its own position to be determined entirely by the fact that Constantinople, the new Rome, was the seat of the Roman emperor and the Senate in a world where church boundaries, for administrative reasons, reflected political limits.Apart from the different understandings of the personality of church power, the most significant doctrinal difference between Eastern and Western Christians arose over the exact wording of the Nicene Creed. The Orthodox churches demanded that no words be added to or taken away from the ancient and fundamental statement of the faith, as issued by the councils of Nicaea and Constantinople in the 4th century. During the early Middle Ages the Latin word filioque, meaning and from the Son, was added in the Latin Christian world, thus rendering the creed as I believe in the Holy Spirit who proceeds from the Father and from the Son. Charlema gne and his successors promoted the outburst, primarily opposed by the popes, in Europe. Eventually, it was also accepted in Rome in about 1014. Western theologians believed that this teaching preserved the spirit of the original creed. But Orthodox teachers believed that it had n... ...r tsars, Moscow had become the so-called third Rome, direct heir to the imperial and ecclesiastical supremacy of ancient Rome and Constantinople. The patriarchs of Moscow never enjoyed anything like the relative freedom of the Byzantine patriarchs, where church laws regulated the interference of the emperor and were generally respected. In Russia the tsars exercised complete domination over church affairs, except for the brief reign of Patriarch Nikon in the mid-17th century. In 1721 Tsar Peter the Great abolished the patriarchate altogether, and thereafter the church was governed through the imperial administration. The patriarchate was reestablished in 1917, at the time of the Russian Revolution, but soon afterward the Russian church was violently persecuted by the Communist government. As the Soviet regime became less repressive and, in 1991, broke up, the church started to regain its vitality. The Orthodox churches in Eastern Europe also faced persecution by oppressive Communist governments after World War II ended in 1945, but they too regained their authority in the 1990s and are slowly reestablishing their place in the moral, religious, and cultural life of their people.